# Command A vs Gemma 7B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 7B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command A leads 47.6 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 215 | 299 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1048 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1042 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1001 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 963 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemma 7B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 7B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.