# Command A vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Command A and Gemma 3n E4b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 37.0 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 215 | 206 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1268 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1284 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1251 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1246 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1276 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Command A and Gemma 3n E4b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command A or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.