# Command A vs Gemma 2 2b IT

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemma-2-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 32.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 33.1 |
| Rank | 215 | 248 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1112 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1113 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1135 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1096 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1157 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1140 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1118 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1130 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1118 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.