# Command A vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command A leads 47.6 to 25.1.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 215 | 313 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1034 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1005 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1047 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 970 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1012 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 990 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 992 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 959 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.