# Command A vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

> Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemini-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.7 Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 50.4% for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 59.8 |
| Rank | 215 | 14 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.75 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $3.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 65.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 43.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 20.3% |
| SciCode | — | 59.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 904.3 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 67.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 5% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.8% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1494 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 96.8% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 50.4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 84.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 94% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 95.5% |
| CritPt | — | 14.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 47% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 37% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 157.27 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1507 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 71.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 36.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1508 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 69.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1316 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 26.7% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1484 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1548 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1505 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1498 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1512 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1483 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1516 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1503 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1483 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1492 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1490 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1723 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1489 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Gemini 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 3.7 Flash share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44.