# Command A vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemini-3-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.4 to 47.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 37.6% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 212 | 113 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1455 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1440 |
| SciCode | — | 41.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 39% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.27 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1441 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 83.5% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 37.6% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 10.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 53.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.12 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1431 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 26% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 13% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1430 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1428 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1454 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1443 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1440 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1419 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1559 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38.