# Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

> Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemini-2-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 35.8 to 27.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 12% for Command A and 55.1% for Gemini 2.5 Flash.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 39.3 |
| Rank | 215 | 170 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | 55.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1424 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 28.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 661.88 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 56.2% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 17.1% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 41.1% |
| BALROG | — | 33.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 548.84 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 56.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1422 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 76.5% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 27.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 33.3% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 2.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.03 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.6 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1415 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 38.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 7.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1426 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 12.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 16.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39% |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| GeoBench | — | 76% |
| VPCT | — | 46.2% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 36.9% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1433 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1418 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1421 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1405 |
| IFEval | — | 89.8% |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1419 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1400 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1408 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.5% |
| WildBench | — | 81.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54.