# Command A vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

> Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemini-2-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 38.5 to 27.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 57.1% for Command A and 36.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 215 | 211 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1373 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 36.9% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 40.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1377 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 62.8% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.94 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1373 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 3.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1373 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1388 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1367 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1367 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1366 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.