# Command A vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 36.2 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Command A and 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 27.3 |
| Rank | 215 | 332 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1108 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 45.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.04 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1132 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1059 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 70% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1114 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1132 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1139 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.