# Command A vs Falcon-180B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 25.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 215 | 260 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1007 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

| Benchmark | Command A | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1013 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Falcon-180B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Falcon-180B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.