# Command A vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-ernie-5-0
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 47.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.2 |
| Rank | 212 | 129 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1455 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: —

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1446 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1437 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1427 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1462 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1383 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1413 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1422 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)

| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1433 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.