# Command A vs Deepseek Coder v2

> Command A and Deepseek Coder v2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-deepseek-coder-v2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Deepseek Coder v2 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.1 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 215 | 220 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1251 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.7% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 82.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 75.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Deepseek Coder v2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1207 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.7% |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1241 |
| GSM8K | — | 94.5% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1181 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 64.3% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1182 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1201 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1185 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1164 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1126 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1104 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1188 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1153 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1180 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1219 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | Command A | Deepseek Coder v2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1120 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1177 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Deepseek Coder v2?

Command A and Deepseek Coder v2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command A or Deepseek Coder v2 better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Deepseek Coder v2 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Deepseek Coder v2 has 24.