# Command A vs DeepSeek Coder 6.7B

> Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#212); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-deepseek-coder-6-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.2 to 26.8.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 212 | — |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216)

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 71.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 65.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 88.88 |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.6% |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 21.3% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 36.4% |
| MMLU | — | 36.4% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than DeepSeek Coder 6.7B?

Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#212); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Command A or DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and DeepSeek Coder 6.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9.