# Codestral vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

> Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen3-vl-235b-a22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 41.8 to 26.9.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 287 | 98 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 41.8 (#103)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1438 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 28.1 (#92)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 36.2 (#120)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1426 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.6 (#120)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 52.1 (#92)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1427 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.4 (#95)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1407 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1420 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.4 (#94)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1428 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Codestral or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.