# Codestral vs Qwen3 8B

> Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 8B leads 33.4 to 26.9.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 287 | 237 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is Codestral or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.