# Codestral vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

> Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 36.7 to 26.9.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.49 for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 37.2 |
| Rank | 287 | 194 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $1.49 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 36.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 21.9 (#126)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 27.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.92 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.9 (#90)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $1.49.

### Is Codestral or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.