# Codestral vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Codestral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 290 | 302 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $8.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | 36% |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Codestral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.