# Codestral vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-Coder-32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codestral leads 26.9 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 41.8% for Codestral and 49% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 287 | 239 |
| Context | 256K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | 49% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | 77% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.41 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-Coder-32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Codestral or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Codestral scores higher on coding benchmarks: 26.9 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.