# Codestral vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

> Codestral has enough public results to be ranked (#290); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen2-5-14b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 27.3.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 290 | — |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 52.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Codestral has enough public results to be ranked (#290); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is Codestral or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.