# Codestral vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Codestral and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.1 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 31.4 to 26.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.5% for Codestral and 40.3% for Qwen1.5-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 287 | 282 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | 61.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1166 |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1158 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Codestral and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.1 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codestral or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen1.5-72B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.