# Codestral vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 38.0 to 26.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 287 | 182 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1318 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codestral or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.