# Codestral vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 34.6 to 26.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 287 | 248 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codestral or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.