# Codestral vs o1

> o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 58× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-o1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where o1 leads 45.7 to 26.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 11.1% for Codestral and 61.7% for o1.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 200K.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 40.6 |
| Rank | 287 | 140 |
| Context | 256K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- o1: 45.7 (#64)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | 61.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | 80.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- o1: 24.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- o1: 27.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- o1: 34.9 (#150)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- o1: 41.5 (#101)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- o1: 33.6 (#87)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- o1: 48.8 (#137)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1343 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- o1: 75.0 (#82)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1368 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- o1: 50.3 (#9)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- o1: 55.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Codestral | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1347 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1368 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 58× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or o1?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.

### Is Codestral or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and o1 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.