# Codestral vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 19.1.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 287 | 43 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1497 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.32 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1457 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1484 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Muse Spark 1.1?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Is Codestral or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.