# Codestral vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 43.4 to 26.9.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 287 | 102 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | 785.17 |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is Codestral or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.