# Codestral vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 43.3 to 27.3.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 290 | 88 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Codestral | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is Codestral or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.