# Codestral vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

> Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-llama-3-1-nemotron-70b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.3 to 26.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 287 | 199 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | 38.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 48.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1272 |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1266 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1271 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1242 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1227 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1252 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1239 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codestral or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.