# Codestral vs Llama 3.1-70B

> Codestral and Llama 3.1-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-llama-3-1-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 290 | 308 |
| Context | 256K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | 46.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 54.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1260 |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1241 |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.92 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1252 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1209 |
| MMLU | — | 80.1% |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1215 |
| LMArena French | — | 1261 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1253 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1231 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1241 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1232 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1256 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Codestral and Llama 3.1-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Llama 3.1-70B?

Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is Codestral or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Llama 3.1-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Llama 3.1-70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.