# Codestral vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 32.5 to 19.8.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 290 | 70 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codestral or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.