# Codestral vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 35.8 to 26.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 287 | 213 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1247 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1244 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1221 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1240 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1210 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1243 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codestral or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.