# Codestral vs Granite 4.0 Micro

> Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Codestral's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-granite-4-0-micro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 29.0 |
| Rank | 290 | 318 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.017 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 67% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Granite 4.0 Micro?

Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Codestral's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Granite 4.0 Micro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.