# Codestral vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

> Codestral and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-granite-3-0-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 41.8% for Codestral and 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 290 | 286 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | 20.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1090 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1117 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1064 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1045 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1056 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1070 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1053 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Codestral and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codestral or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.