# Codestral vs Gemma 3 27B

> Codestral and Gemma 3 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-gemma-3-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codestral leads 27.3 to 22.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 32.5% for Codestral and 40.4% for Gemma 3 27B.
- Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
- Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Google |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 290 | 284 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
- Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | 4.9% |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 39.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
- Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | 40.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1340 |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 51.5% |
| LMCA | — | 12.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.04 |
| LiveBench | — | 50% |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 22.5% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1312 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 74% |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1304 |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena French | — | 1368 |
| LMArena German | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1349 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 74.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1321 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1333 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1346 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1345 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Gemma 3 27B?

Codestral and Gemma 3 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is Codestral or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

Codestral scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.3 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Gemma 3 27B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.