# Codestral vs ERNIE 5.1

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-ernie-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 43.4 to 26.9.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 287 | 87 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1481 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1491 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1486 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)

| Benchmark | Codestral | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1471 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codestral or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and ERNIE 5.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.