# Codestral vs Seed 2.0 Pro

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-dola-seed-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 42.9 to 26.9.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 287 | 97 |
| Context | 256K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1472 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1453 |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1440 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |

## Multimodal

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1275 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1490 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1443 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1460 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1428 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1441 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Seed 2.0 Pro?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Codestral or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 256K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Seed 2.0 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.