# Codestral vs Command A

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 9.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codestral-vs-command-a
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 2 categories and Command A in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.

## Snapshot

| | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 287 | 212 |
| Context | 256K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codestral: 26.9 (#316)
- Command A: 26.8 (#317)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | 12% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1331 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 35.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 57.1% |

## Reasoning

- Codestral: 19.1 (#244)
- Command A: 17.7 (#276)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | 28.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1326 |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LMCA | — | 10.3% |

## Math

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 33.5 (#172)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1300 |

## Knowledge

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 36.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 45.5 (#166)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1327 |
| LMArena French | — | 1352 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1346 |

## Instruction Following

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 69.3 (#172)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1309 |

## Long Context

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 40.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1334 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codestral: —
- Command A: 47.8 (#204)

| Benchmark | Codestral | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1319 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1338 |

## FAQ

### Is Codestral better than Command A?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 9.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Codestral or Command A?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Codestral or Command A better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (26.9 vs 26.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 256K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Codestral and Command A share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.