# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 56.9 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 237 | 42 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1481 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.