# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.4 to 33.6.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 236 | 54 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.67 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1456 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1440 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.