# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 50.3 to 33.4.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 237 | 117 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.