# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.8 to 20.1.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 237 | 106 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.