# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 33.4.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 237 | 71 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1483 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.