# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 27B

> Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 50.8 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 237 | 127 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1358 |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1414 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1241 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1410 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1393 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1410 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.5 27B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.