# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.6 to 22.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 49.6% for Codellama 70b Instruct and 58% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 237 | 245 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 49% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | 87.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.