# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 236 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 46.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.