# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-4b-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 33.4 to 23.8.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 237 | 322 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 976 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.
