# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-110B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.6 to 24.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 40.7% for Codellama 70b Instruct and 35% for Qwen1.5-110B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 237 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 44.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.