# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Plus in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen Plus leads 45.3 to 24.9.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 236 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.