# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.6 to 33.6.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 49.8 |
| Rank | 236 | 44 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1532 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1497 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1490 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.18 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 43% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1485 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1304 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1479 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1494 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1466 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1444 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1504 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.