# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.5 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 237 | 131 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Muse Glimmer share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.