# Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 33.6.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 236 | 102 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.